Scrum Monsters

One reason I hate traditional PMO is because they got in the way (notice this is past tense ;) They would sporadically insert themselves into the deeply complex conversations about what’s really going on, assume to understand it, then send some garbled message to higher-ups that only further burdens the Dev teams with the task of unwinding it. Painful.

As a process guy the logical observation was to just cut-out the middle man, which I have done. On my team I dont have 3 layers of “governance”: scrum master, project mgr and PMO. I fold all that into one role I call the Scrum Monster. Those who know best manage the distant roadmap projects for just their team(s) in a collaborative data space, not some outsider with unrealistic dates. In this way I get a living resource map, rolled up enterprise-wide, from those who know best.

Traditional scrum masters engage in 3 layers of planning: daily scrums, sprints and release plans. I add one more layer: the roadmap for their team. Scrum Monsters manage the roadmap expectations of their teams exactly as they manage expectations for projects and sprints.

About these ads

One thought on “Scrum Monsters

  1. Pingback: Agile Portfolio Management – Iterative Roadmap Grooming | Tiny PMO

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s